+1, for all of the below.
d/
On 4/17/2018 8:41 AM, Steve Atkins wrote:
On Apr 16, 2018, at 11:07 PM, Kazunori ANDO <a...@bbsec.co.jp> wrote:
I think "virtual DMARC" is out of DMARC scope,
because it's a purely internal policy decision.
+1 for the (not entirely unreasonable, but entirely internal) algorithm used,
-1 for the terminology.
Where it's in scope is that it's using the term DMARC for something that is
really not DMARC and as part of that it seems to suggest squatting on the
dmarc= namespace in Authentication-Results.
On 2018/03/20 6:17, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Fundamentally, both SPF "Best Guess" and "Virtual DMARC" destroy the opt-in
nature of SPF and DMARC and should be considered harmful.
+1
Again, please don't do this.
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
