On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:16 AM, Jeremy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 04:10 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > >> + this (new?) requirement to check on h-tags for > >> AS mean that a common parse routine for the three > >> header types cannot be used. Did I miss the discussion > >> introducing the requirement? > >> > > > > The 'h' tag was never defined for the AS header. > > Indeed, but there was no requirement to check for one either. Correct - this was a clarification that has been added. If people find it objectionable we can take it back out. What would your parser do if it found an "h" tag in the header? Just ignore it or override the implicit "h" that is defined for AS? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
