On 06/25/2018 05:09 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 6/25/2018 6:03 AM, Jeremy Harris wrote: >> On 06/25/2018 04:44 PM, Dave Crocker wrote: >>> If the creator of the information does not have a reliable way of >>> knowing what the receiver of it will do with it -- I mean interpretation >>> of the information, not follow-on policy decision-making -- then it >>> isn't a standard. >> >> On that view, the spec should be either >> >> "any tag not specified here, in any of the three ARC headers, >> invalidates the ARC set" >> >> or >> >> "any tag not specified here, in any of the three ARC headers, >> MUST be ignored". > > > While there are some operational environments where one of these two > choices really is appropriate -- the need for extremely rigorous control > over the entire range of operational choice is... extreme -- this isn't > one of them.
Then I'm unclear what you were asking for with > Anything that comes close to 'do whatever you want with this information' > demonstrates NON-standardization. Perhaps you could suggest some text for the spec? -- Jeremy _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
