On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> wrote:
> On 06/27/2018 09:15 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > > We already tried to walk that line in the spec. In general, any tag that > > does not have a defined interpretation (firstly in the ARC spec, then > > falling back to the DKIM spec) gets ignored with certain exceptions, such > > as the "h" tag in an AS header. > > That does not say why that specific case is worthy of special attention. > I think you need to justify it. I think saying: Notably absent from this list is the "h" tag. It is not required for the ARC-Seal because the list and order of header fields included in the seal are prescribed in this specification. ....should suffice. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
