On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 8:30 AM, Jeremy Harris <j...@wizmail.org> wrote:
> On 06/25/2018 04:18 PM, Kurt Andersen (b) wrote: > > Correct - this was a clarification that has been added. If people find it > > objectionable we can take it back out. What would your parser do if it > > found an "h" tag in the header? Just ignore it or override the implicit > "h" > > that is defined for AS? > > Just ignore it That's the right approach, but the ambiguity of what a validator might do is why we thought it best to be explicit. I guess that we could drop the illegality of an "h" tag and just specify that it MUST be ignored instead. Opinions from any other implementations? --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
