On 6/25/2020 3:58 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
Why would I be expressing an interpretation of the charter that I didn't think
is correct?
That's not what i said.
I mean that you are asserting a requirement as if it were established,
based on your interpretation. the requirement is not established and,
of course, i believe it won't be.
Absent direction from the chairs, of course I'm going to operate on the basis
of my interpretation (although I think it's less interpretation and more
reading what's explicitly there, I'd imagine you would view it differently).
The point is needing to be more tentative. Opinions are of course
fine. The state of being an opinion is transitive. It flows onto any
assertions made based on it.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
