On Thursday, June 25, 2020 5:16:43 PM EDT Dave Crocker wrote: > On 6/25/2020 2:10 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I would encourage people to review the working group charter. I think > > dumping 5322.From and aligning to something else is well outside of it. > > Not saying we couldn't recharter, but I'm skeptical of the value of this > > entire thread. > What is it about Item 1 in the charter that precludes this work? > > What is it about Item 2 in the charter that precludes this work?
Even before you get to those: > The working group will seek to preserve interoperability with the > installed base of DMARC systems, and provide detailed justification > for any non-interoperability. In fact, the first sentence of the charter includes it in the definition of DMARC: > Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting & Conformance (DMARC) > uses existing mail authentication technologies (SPF and DKIM) to > extend validation to the RFC5322.From field. This entire thread is about making something that's not DMARC. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
