On 6/25/20 2:20 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > Even before you get to those: > >> The working group will seek to preserve interoperability with the >> installed base of DMARC systems, and provide detailed justification >> for any non-interoperability.
The paragraph goes on to say: > As the working group develops solutions > to deal with indirect mail flows, it will seek to maintain the > end-to-end nature of existing identifier fields in mail, in > particular avoiding solutions that require rewriting of originator > fields. I interpret that "seek to" as of equal importance to the previous one. But we're spending an awful lot of WG bandwidth discussing rewriting, while Dave's "what if" proposal doesn't require any. -Jim
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
