> Il 06/10/2020 01:57 Jesse Thompson <[email protected]>
> ha scritto:
>
> e.g. I find it hard to imagine that an ISP would have the willingness to
> exempt a boutique MLM for all of their customers, so ARC, in and of itself,
> doesn't really help MLMs move away from From munging. Does it make sense to
> suggest that in order for ARC to succeed, then ISPs need to offer a way for
> their customers to define their trusted intermediaries? What if the ISP
> chooses not to offer that? Do they "support ARC" in a meaningful way?
>From a policy standpoint, it is troubling to imagine that each email system
>would define their own list of trusted ARC intermediaries. This is a recipe
>for centralization and oligopoly, as most people would just create a shortlist
>of a few well known big intermediaries, and any smaller entity trying to
>compete with them (including non-profit operations, community servers,
>self-hosted mailing lists etc) would be at a serious disadvantage. There is
>also the problem of keeping these lists up to date once installed. It would be
>much better if there were a few professional/community efforts to build
>reliable and complete lists of good and bad ARC intermediaries, like for spam.
--
Vittorio Bertola | Head of Policy & Innovation, Open-Xchange
[email protected]
Office @ Via Treviso 12, 10144 Torino, Italy
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
