On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 10:41 AM Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > All > > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming > meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be > altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well recently, and > the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. We wanted > to get some feedback from the working group. > > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a > meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the > meeting and keep moving along. > I'd vote for 3. I think that it would be better to discuss/hash out these topics on the list. Perhaps we could start each one with a cogent summary of the issues related to the topic. --Kurt
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
