On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming
meeting. Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be
altered. Since work items have been progressing rather well recently,
and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting. We
wanted to get some feedback from the working group.
Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together. Should we 1) have a
meeting around these topics; 2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the
meeting and keep moving along.
Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled because
one of its 3 chairs can't attend?
Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be useful?
Really?
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
