On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:08 PM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Failing that, I have another proposal to consider that might aid us in > > shipping a standards track DMARC sooner: Remove any and all mention of > > failure reports, and do all that in a later add-on document as was done > > with RFC 6651. > > Given how marginal failure reports have turned out to be, that doesn't > seem like a great use of our time. > Well the "Remove" part was the key to getting us unstuck if this turns out to be a pain point, if they are indeed marginal and seldom used. So stick a "maybe" before "do". -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
