On Thu 24/Dec/2020 19:55:07 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
On Thu 24/Dec/2020 03:39:03 +0100 Tim Wicinski wrote:
I Believe I agree with the current version, but can someone post what we
think is the final text?
See below, with the two changes mentioned before and Mr Copy Edit's minor
tightening up which I hope are not controversial.
Ale said:
I posted it here:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting
Hold it. I don't recall that we agreed to break failure reports into a separate
document.
The fact that draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-00 exists on IETF datatracker
seems to confirm WG consensus. But see also:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/2DsSazvE9QxFjVSeg_mdNlRMETM
It makes more work and I see no agreement to change anything beyond the
security paragraph. In particular, we have nothing to offer on what one
might or might not redact.
I still think it'd be a good idea to mention RFC 6590...
Anyway, the change at hand arose from a ticket, as per Subject:. After a long
discussion, the new paragraph was explicitly proposed for the Introduction of
the separated document, where it is most effective. IMHO, Ned's wording —which
you said to ship— is more comprehensive than the abbreviated version quoted
below, hence preferable.
Why did you change your mind?
Best
Ale
Security considerations
Failure reports provide detailed information about the failure of a
single message or a group of similar messages failing for the same
reason. They are meant to aid domain owners to detect why failures
reported in aggregate form occurred. It is important to note these
reports can contain either the header or the entire content of a
failed message, which in turn may contain personally identifiable
information, which should be considered when deciding whether to
generate such reports.
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
