I will admit my memory can get pretty hazy, but I agree with Mr Levine - I remember splitting out reporting, but only as one document.
The Working Group can always make a compelling case to change this tim On Mon, Dec 28, 2020 at 12:06 PM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, Ned Freed wrote: > > I'm not ethusiastic about the split, but if that's what people want then > so be > > it. I will say that my experience has been that doing so is usually more > work > > and provides less benefit than you'd expect. > > I recall agreeing to split out all of the reporting into a separate draft, > which makes some sense so the two parts can proceed separately, but not > further splitting aggregate and failure reports. > > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
