I Believe I agree with the current version, but can someone post what we think is the final text?
tim On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 9:12 PM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, Dotzero wrote: > > Based on my experience, I disagree that failure reports are marginal and > > seldom used. It's kind of like an iceberg, mostly below the surface. ... > > Seems to me that if we splice in Ned's tweaked privacy language, we're > done. I don't see any reason to change the technical spec. People will > send what they send, and it's become clear that we have nothing useful to > say about what one might redact. > > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
