I think that Ale's expression that he had difficulty understanding the description of the tree walk as written is a strong sign we still need to improve the language. Of the people involved in this specific discussion, as far as I know, he's the only one who's first language isn't English. That's true for most of the people in the world, so I don't think we can call it quite done.
I took a look at the description ot the tree walk in section 4.6 and I didn't see anything to change. I suppose we could add a sentence at the top of the section reiterating some of the discussion in 4.4 that you do tree walks on two domains to see if they are in relaxed alignment, or that you do a tree walk on the RFC5322.From domain to find its policy domain, but those seem marginal.
What Ale seemed to be asking for was something saying these aren't zone cuts and it's not the PSL. I don't think that would be a good idea. The list of things we are not doing is unlimited, and mentioning some of them just leads to questions about if you're not doing them, why did you mention them?
I'd really like to find someone who's implemented DMARC and isn't on this list, and see what they think. Do we know the people who maintain rspamd?
Regards, John Levine, [email protected], Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
