On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:59 PM Douglas Foster < [email protected]> wrote:
> MUST seems to take us back to the unfinished debate of 3 years ago, where > some asserted that DMARC did more harm than good and should only be used > for transactional mail, which seemed to mean PayPal and not much else. > Have we concluded that DMARC (or "reject" in particular) is now appropriate for use with non-transactional mail? -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
