It appears that Scott Kitterman <[email protected]> said: >My recollection is that a general formulation that I proposed had at least >some traction out of both groups: > >> [some appropriate description] domains MUST NOT publish restrictive DMARC >> policies due to interoperability issues
This seems like a reasonable approach. As a purely practical point, I cannot imagine this document getting through the IESG without some clear guidance about DMARC's interop issues. R's, John PS: If anyone was going to suggest we just tell people how to change their mailing lists to work around DMARC, don't go there. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
