On Wed 29/Mar/2023 15:25:19 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 8:59 PM Douglas Foster wrote:
MUST seems to take us back to the unfinished debate of 3 years ago, where
some asserted that DMARC did more harm than good and should only be used
for transactional mail, which seemed to mean PayPal and not much else.
Have we concluded that DMARC (or "reject" in particular) is now appropriate
for use with non-transactional mail?
Not yet.
Anyway, receiver-side forwarding (with possible footer additions e.g. by
anti-virus) make the transactional vs. human distinction not so much significant.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
