I have a concept for how to solve this, in a form that Big Tech can accept. We ask the intended recipient to arbitrate whether a stream of unauthenticated message (but otherwise innocuous) messages are wanted or not. I hope to have details ready tomorrow.
DF On Wed, Mar 29, 2023, 10:23 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 11:01 AM Douglas Foster < > dougfoster.emailstanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Someone please explain to me why everyone should make themselves more >> vulnerable to ransomware and other attacks so that mailing lists can avoid >> being inconvenienced and avoid having secure operating practices. >> > > I think we've had this discussion before. This argument reduces to: "I do > not like what structured mailing lists, which have been around since the > '90s at least, do with messages, and I now insist that they change their > practices to meet what I perceive to be my requirements." > > Compelling a very broad deployed base to change its practices in an > incompatible way is not a light undertaking. For this to be sustainable, > we (the whole community) need to achieve consensus that it's the right way > for the entire ecosystem to move. > > -MSK, participating >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
