It appears that Neil Anuskiewicz <[email protected]> said: >-=-=-=-=-=- >To this point, some inbound configurations have no record or a permerror have >a continue disposition. Is that risky? Everything is a trade off so I� m not >asking is there any >risk at all but more asking about the trade offs.
It seems to me this particular question has been beaten way past the point of death. We all know about the damage to mailing lists, the workarounds ranging from kludgy (hide the real sender in a rewritten address) to terrible (put the list name on the From line), with a variety of blame the victim arguments that somehow it is the fault of mailing lists for not anticipating in the 1980s that someone would invent DMARC thirty years later. We also know about various kinds of forwarding that break, particularly when DMARC only uses SPF, and the nearly forgotten "forward to a friend" that used to let you put your own address when you ask a web site to forward a copy of an article you read. We're never going to persuade DMARC absolutists that the damage is real, nor the rest of us that we can wave our hands and ignore the damage. R's, John
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
