On July 19, 2023 5:38:08 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: >On Wed 19/Jul/2023 15:25:17 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote: >> On July 19, 2023 7:27:00 AM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed 19/Jul/2023 08:20:14 +0200 Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:27 AM Douglas Foster < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> 1) For evaluators that enforce DMARC against lists, are they willing to >>>>> consider any concessions to list traffic? If so, do they favor an >>>>> exemption process where the list avoids munging, or an unmunging solution >>>>> implemented at their inbound gateway? >>>> >>>> How do you determine that an evaluator is enforcing DMARC "against lists"? >>> >>> That assumes there are lists that don't munge From:. Is that real today? >> >> Most of my list mail is from lists that don't. > > >Oops, I had in mind that lists modify messages. Some of them don't, that way >they don't need From: munging. It is quite common too. > >Let me reword the question: Are there lists that modify messages and don't >munge From:? > Yes, although those are fewer.
Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
