On Fri 21/Jul/2023 17:18:50 +0200 Scott Kitterman wrote:
On July 21, 2023 3:14:58 PM UTC, Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote:
Maybe one day there will be a DMARC with batteries included, where implementers
ship default configurations which are effective out of the box. While I don't
know how to get there, I think it's counter-productive to exact perfect
compliance during the transition. There have to be people who think they have
good reasons to push, otherwise we won't move.
It's not a transition until there's something to transition to. Currently it's
a bridge to nowhere.
As Doug said it's not at all clear what everybody's goal in this effort is,
I'll state mine too.
I run a tiny mail server for family and friends. I find it frustrating to rely
on DNSBLs both as a receiver and as a sender, blocking and being blocked at
random. I /believe/ there is a better, clean way that anyone could easily
operate a small mail server. Email authentication seems to me to be on the
path to make that belief come true.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
