This document is also ready for our final look, so this message starts
a working group last call for the aggregate reporting document, with
the same timing as for the DMARC spec.

Please post to the DMARC mailing list by 31 March, giving your last
call comments (which should include “I read it and I think it’s ready”
as well).  If you have significant issues to raise that have not
already been discussed and closed, please post each of those as a
separate thread.  Minor issues and editorial comments can just be
posted here, to this thread, and we can split them off if necessary.

Barry

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 5:37 PM Brotman, Alex
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
>
> Mostly some typos being corrected.  Changed the URL in the XSD per Ale's 
> suggestion. Added a paragraph about the Error field.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Alex Brotman
> Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
> Comcast
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dmarc <[email protected]> On Behalf Of [email protected]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2024 8:32 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Subject: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: 
> > draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt
> >
> > Internet-Draft draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt is now available.
> > It is a work item of the Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting &
> > Conformance (DMARC) WG of the IETF.
> >
> >    Title:   DMARC Aggregate Reporting
> >    Author:  Alex Brotman
> >    Name:    draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14.txt
> >    Pages:   28
> >    Dates:   2024-02-28
> >
> > Abstract:
> >
> >    DMARC allows for domain holders to request aggregate reports from
> >    receivers.  This report is an XML document, and contains extensible
> >    elements that allow for other types of data to be specified later.
> >    The aggregate reports can be submitted to the domain holder's
> >    specified destination as supported by the receiver.
> >
> >    This document (along with others) obsoletes [RFC7489].
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-
> > aggregate-
> > reporting/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Eh7CcgDsmdyuvKl0gabUhtWziumH7vcUO6CZ19hik
> > uQYNDz_7FzKwlKvtIIqEtN3ZmQrfBi4e03gW_l8umC0DN3JAA1hJA$
> >
> > There is also an HTML version available at:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dmarc-
> > aggregate-reporting-
> > 14.html__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Eh7CcgDsmdyuvKl0gabUhtWziumH7vcUO6CZ19hikuQ
> > YNDz_7FzKwlKvtIIqEtN3ZmQrfBi4e03gW_l8umC0DN2WEA_XEg$
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-
> > dmarc-aggregate-reporting-
> > 14__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!Eh7CcgDsmdyuvKl0gabUhtWziumH7vcUO6CZ19hikuQYNDz
> > _7FzKwlKvtIIqEtN3ZmQrfBi4e03gW_l8umC0DN3_aIbO4w$
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
> > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dmarc mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc__;!!C
> > Ql3mcHX2A!Eh7CcgDsmdyuvKl0gabUhtWziumH7vcUO6CZ19hikuQYNDz_7FzKwl
> > KvtIIqEtN3ZmQrfBi4e03gW_l8umC0DN0f5XjmCQ$
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to