On Monday, April 1, 2024 4:45:20 PM EDT Todd Herr wrote: > Greetings. > > Issue 141 has been opened to collect ideas around the discussion about what > to say in DMARCbis (if anything) about honoring SPF records that end in > -all when SPF fails. > > https://github.com/ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/issues/141
I don't really understand the need for this. What to do when SPF produces a fail result is an SPF question. Not a DMARC question. Additionally, we have discussed this before. Note that not even RFC 7208 tells receivers what to do with SPF fail. It seems far, far out of scope to do so here. On the theory that the invocation not to relitigate things we've already gone through won't be honored entirely in the breach, can we not do this? Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
