If we agree that ARC is stable and valuable enough to move to the standards track, as Tero suggested, then that can be the WG's next order of business, but please don't let that debate slow down the main document's progress.
On this point, however: On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 10:23 AM Alessandro Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > A system handling billion users must be pretty fat. They handle flags, > IMAP > keywords, web mail preferences, address books and who knows what else. > Handling subscriptions is just another file. > > I agree that the interface for asking to confirm subscriptions must be > quite > hard to design. However, users who subscribe to mailing list or set up > forwarding must have a minimal degree of sophistication. > > Confirming a subscription only affects that user's mailbox. No games. > Two things: (a) Your model appears to presume users who are patient, error-free, and tolerant of additional hurdles to what they think of as normal operation. (b) We've debated this a number of times over the years. If bringing humans into the loop of determining the value of ARC or DKIM results was a useful and scalable exercise, I think one of the large operators would've done it by now. -MSK
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
