-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In message <[email protected]>, John R Levine <[email protected]> writes
>On Fri, 25 Oct 2024, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> If we agree that ARC is stable and valuable enough to move to the standards >> track, as Tero suggested, then that can be the WG's next order of business, >> but please don't let that debate slow down the main document's progress. > >I don't think it is. The same people who invented ARC are now working on >DKIM2, using what we learned about ARC, and I expect that once DKIM2 is >implemented we'll all forget about ARC. > >Since ARC is an IETF experiment, once DKIM2 is further along and it's >clearer what it does differently from ARC, it's worth a short followup to >8617 to say what we learned. One of the aims of DKIM2 is to make ARC unnecessary, and in particular to ensure that cases where an intermediate system must be trusted relate only to improving your heuristics which detect DKIM-replay or where you have a contractual relationship with that intermediary. - -- richard Richard Clayton Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. Benjamin Franklin 11 Nov 1755 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1 iQA/AwUBZx0oUd2nQQHFxEViEQLptgCffkZavOw/B/RrAy+8bru3wU046V8An1XU jpWBtSusp28C/es7P88f6IP4 =BpSK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
