On Sat 26/Oct/2024 00:42:13 +0200 John R Levine wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
If we agree that ARC is stable and valuable enough to move to the standards
track, as Tero suggested, then that can be the WG's next order of business,
but please don't let that debate slow down the main document's progress.
I don't think it is. The same people who invented ARC are now working on
DKIM2, using what we learned about ARC, and I expect that once DKIM2 is
implemented we'll all forget about ARC.
Doesn't that suggests that ARC2 would be a better name than DKIM2? Anyway, it
will take a while before we can get it on track.
Fixing ARC and arranging for a method to convey trust is much easier for us and
requires no major rewriting of mail software globally. It's one of the so
called low hanging fruits.
DKIM2 fixes a number of other issues. Actually, I don't think we need to look
at it as an alternative to ARC for the mailing list problem. Indeed, the
"algebra" designated for that problem is expected to "be in a stand-alone
document that need not be finalized on the same timescale as DKIM2 itself."
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
