Hi,

Le 02/02/2026 à 20:07, Murray S. Kucherawy a écrit :>
> I did suggest taking this work in DKIM2, but its completion date is
> farther in the future than would be useful to solve Trent's immediate
> problem.

how "farther in the future" is it, really? Do you mean mailing list
users will have to wait another *decade* before the IETF addresses a
known interoperability problem?

ARC is at least half of a working solution. I for one would prefer that
whoever takes the responsibility to obsolete it also takes the other
responsibility to devise its replacement quickly.

If this has to be the DKIM working group, so be it, but then IMHO they
should adopt the ARC document and organize the transition period as they
see fit, rather than be second-guessed by this working group.

Cheers,
B.C.

_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to