I suspect they're mostly just used inside the interpreter and constfolding code, so maybe it wouldn't be that big a deal after all.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 3:22 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sure, the names used in dmd aren't particularly consistent... but do >> you really want to break every open pull request? > > > Hmm indeed a problem. Maybe one could only change those occurrences that > aren't changed in any pull request. > But in the end most of them are rather small changes that should be trivial > to rebase. > > I also have a hunch that these types aren't used that much inside of > methods, but rather as class member types or function return types. > Most pull requests don't touch these. > > _______________________________________________ > dmd-internals mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
