[email protected], el 28 de enero a las 00:54 me escribiste: > >Well, it's a matter of taste really, I like the _t, I don't see how is > >a bad practice (in C at least makes a lot of sense). Also, even being > >a D compiler, is written in C/C++ and you already have those types > >there, I thought part of your improvements were to remove artificial > >typedef with strange names. > > > >Anyway, I don't care that much... > > Yeah, I know maybe practice isn't the right word. > Anyway, primarily I'd like to have consistent types (+ no senseless > typedefs, yes). > > Secondarily I'd love to have types that at least look like they were > builtin. But it's okay if that isn't desired.
Well, you have to convince Walter, he is the only one deciding what's in and what's out... I was just commenting because you asked for comments :) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Si ella es el sol, yo soy la luna Si ella es el mar, soy el desierto Y estamos en eclipse total Y estamos en eclipse total _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
