[email protected], el 27 de enero a las 17:38 me escribiste: > >>I would personally love to have a set of types that look natural and > >>clear like in D, i.e. without some crappy prefix d_ or suffix _t > >>like int32,uint32,... > > > >They are already there: > >#include <stdint.h> > >int32_t, uint32_t, etc. Sorry but C (and C++ in this case inherits > >C stdlib) uses the _t suffix for typedefs. > > I know. But _t doesn't look natural. In the end it's a D compiler, > so why not introduce some good practice :)
Well, it's a matter of taste really, I like the _t, I don't see how is a bad practice (in C at least makes a lot of sense). Also, even being a D compiler, is written in C/C++ and you already have those types there, I thought part of your improvements were to remove artificial typedef with strange names. Anyway, I don't care that much... -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- We are born naked, wet and hungry Then things get worse _______________________________________________ dmd-internals mailing list [email protected] http://lists.puremagic.com/mailman/listinfo/dmd-internals
