I prefer to take [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 as the basis for wg document
Best Regards Gang 2013/1/10, Shuai Gao <[email protected]>: > Hi Folks, > I support document [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 > adopted > as the WG draft. > Thank you. > > Best, > Shuai > > > > ======= 2012-12-20 04:26:55 您在来信中写道：======= > >>Folks, >> >>We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for >> that. The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" >> document to serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two >> documents on this topic to choose from: >> >>[1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 >>[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 >> >>and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for >> the WG document. >> >>Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing list. >> We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification for >> your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus >> from active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against >> the other. >> >>The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a >> longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. >> >>- Jouni & Julien >>_______________________________________________ >>dmm mailing list >>[email protected] >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = > > > 致 > 礼！ > > > Shuai Gao > National Engineering Lab for Next Generation Internet Interconnection > Devices > Beijing Jiaotong University > Beijing, China, 100044 > [email protected] > 2013-01-10 > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
