Hi all
I prefer [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 more than
the first one.
Best Regards,
Wei
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Behcet
Sarikaya
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 12:04 AM
To: Seok-Joo Koh
Cc: Julien Laganier; [email protected]; Jouni Korhonen
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Seok-Joo Koh
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Happy a new year to everyone !
[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 seems to be more faithful to
the original motivations to DMM.
In addition, both of the two documents are worthwhile to consider in the future
works on DMM.
Accordingly, it is suggested to use [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 as the base document, and
to merge [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 into [2]
draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 appropriately.
Folks let's be realistic. I conjecture that both documents will end up becoming
WG drafts. Why? Consider what happened in Softwire.
Since both are informational, no problem.
Regards,
Behcet
Cheers,
********************
Seok-Joo Koh
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for WG Adoption of a "current practices and gap
analysis" document
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:25 AM, Jouni Korhonen
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Folks,
We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for that.
The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" document to
serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two documents on
this topic to choose from:
[1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02
[2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01
and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for the WG
document.
Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing list. We
would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification for your
selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus from active
WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against the other.
The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a longer
three week call now due the holiday season in between.
- Jouni & Julien
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
--
RSM Department, TELECOM Bretagne, France
Jong-Hyouk Lee, living somewhere between /dev/null and /dev/random
#email: jonghyouk (at) gmail (dot) com
#webpage: http://sites.google.com/site/hurryon/
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
