Hi all, Sorry for my last minute comment. In comparing the two documents, [1] gives a detailed analysis of 3GPP technologies, but may be too much focused on one SDO. [2] analyzes WiFi networks as well as 3GPP, which provides somewhat a good balance for an IETF document by mentioning multiple access technologies. If I have to pick only one, [2] "draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01" is good for the base document.
Regards, -- Hidetoshi (2012/12/20 5:25), Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Folks, > > We are unfortunately slipping our milestone, our (chairs) apologies for that. > The next step is to select a "current practices and gap analysis" document to > serve as the basis for the future WG document. We consider two documents on > this topic to choose from: > > [1] draft-zuniga-dmm-gap-analysis-02 > [2] draft-liu-dmm-best-practices-gap-analysis-01 > > and we as a WG need to decide which one is going to form the _basis_ for the > WG document. > > Please voice your preference either for [1] or for [2] on the mailing list. > We would appreciate if you can also provide a one-liner justification for > your selection. The chairs will determine if there is (rough) consensus from > active WG participants to proceed with selecting one document against the > other. > > The call starts today 19th Dec 2012 and ends by 10th Jan 2013. We have a > longer three week call now due the holiday season in between. > > - Jouni & Julien > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
