Hi Seil,
What is the issue with Section 4.7? Do we need to modify it, or is a requirement related multicast excluded from what the DMM WG needs to focus on? Best regards, Georgios ________________________________ Van: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [dmm-boun...@ietf.org] namens Seil Jeon [seilj...@av.it.pt] Verzonden: woensdag 3 april 2013 22:26 To: sarik...@ieee.org Cc: dmm@ietf.org; dmm-cha...@tools.ietf.org Onderwerp: Re: [DMM] WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03 Hi Behcet and all, With regards to what you said, I believe it was already answered several times in the list while it was made. Regards, Seil From: dmm-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 8:59 PM To: Jouni Korhonen Cc: dmm@ietf.org; dmm-cha...@tools.ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC starts for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03 Hi all, If Section 4.7 is removed, I am willing to support this call. The reason: it is immature to say anything on this issue even as a should. Regards, Behcet On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com>> wrote: Just a reminder. There has been zero WGLC reviews so far.. - Jouni On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com<mailto:jouni.nos...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Folks, > > This mail starts a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03. > The issues, even editorials, should be recorded into the Issue Tracker > for a control tracking whether everything has been addressed. We > require minimum three reviews. The more the better, though. > > The WGLC ends on Wednesday 3rd April. > > - Jouni & Julien _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
