On 4/9/13 6:10 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
I believe multicast is a distraction to dmm at this moment.
I am curious as to why you call it a distraction. It seems to me that having multicast support considered at the beginning of the process is much better than trying to bolt it on after the fact. That is the reason that I suggested that DMM-related multicast be discussed in DMM.
Could you explain why multicast should not be considered by DMM? Regards, Brian _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
