On 4/10/2013 8:02 AM, Brian Haberman wrote:
On 4/9/13 6:10 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
I believe multicast is a distraction to dmm at this moment.
I am curious as to why you call it a distraction. It seems to me that
having multicast support considered at the beginning of the process is
much better than trying to bolt it on after the fact. That is the
reason that I suggested that DMM-related multicast be discussed in DMM.
This is why I (and I believe a few other people) wanted this in the
requirements document.
Is your objection that multicast is mentioned at all, or the wording
of the section?
Stig
Could you explain why multicast should not be considered by DMM?
Regards,
Brian
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
