Behcet,

You know very well why the Section 4.7 got inserted into the
document in the first place. If you have specific issues with
the current text, point those out and propose modifications.

- Jouni


On Apr 3, 2013, at 10:58 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> If Section 4.7 is removed, I am willing to support this call.
> 
> The reason: it is immature to say anything on this issue even as a should. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Behcet
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 1:55 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Just a reminder. There has been zero WGLC reviews so far..
> 
> - Jouni
> 
> 
> On Mar 20, 2013, at 7:06 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > This mail starts a two week WGLC for draft-ietf-dmm-requirements-03.
> > The issues, even editorials, should be recorded into the Issue Tracker
> > for a control tracking whether everything has been addressed. We
> > require minimum three reviews. The more the better, though.
> >
> > The WGLC ends on Wednesday 3rd April.
> >
> > - Jouni & Julien
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
> 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to