Hi Charlie, Check this out:
http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-dmm-for-wifi-00.txt Regards, Behcet On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 5:31 AM, Charles E. Perkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello folks, > > I have asked this same question many times, in different words... > > Namely, if we design a solution that fits the requirements, and bridges > the gaps as analyzed in the gap analysis document, have we succeeded? > > Or, is there a requirement for the work to be adopted by 3GPP? > > What if we design for IEEE 802 Wireless, which is currently carrying the > preponderance of the world's wireless data, and will almost assuredly > continue to carry a greater proportion? > > Regards > Charlie P. > > > > On 9/4/2014 3:14 AM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> .... >> >> >> In DMM, precedents and the keen NETEXT, there seems to be a >> hard-rooted disconnect between the product developped - (P)Mobile IP - >> and the deployments. We know for a fact that 3GPP deployments >> (2G/3G/4G) do not use (P)Mobile IP. We also know that 3GPP specs do >> mention Mobile IP. To such a point that I wonder whether 3GPP has not >> the same disconnect as here. >> >> On another hand, we do have indications of where (P)Mobile IP is used >> - the trials, the projects, the kernel code, and not least the >> slideware attracting real customers. >> >> The worry: develop DMM protocol while continuing the disconnect. >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >> > > > -- > Regards, > Charlie P. > > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
