What are protocols you think no one uses ? MIPv6 and NEMOv6 needs maintenance, and probably more than than maintenance.
Regards, Thierry Ernst. > Le 8 janv. 2016 à 20:48, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Jouni.nosmap <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well one can always pursue ISE/AD sponsored track if one so feels like. >> >> Just saying there are options.. if one desires to go through the WG process >> DMM has provisions for Mobile IPv6 protocol family maintenance work. >> > > I started this thread by stating that: > > Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no one uses? > For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find their places in > the conferences or journals. > > No one objected to the first point. > > So what is the justification for maintenance? As I said before, > charter items can be changed or they do not have to be used. > > Behcet >> Jouni >> >> Sent from a smart phone.. Mind the typos.. >> >>> Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> kirjoitti 8.1.2016 kello 9.15: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Jouni Korhonen <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> As Sri pointed out DMM is OK to work on "maintenance-oriented extensions of >>>> the Mobile IPv6 protocol family". So this is likely the venue within IETF. >>>> Mobile IPv4 as such has no place here. >>> >>> >>> Why not ISE? For both MIPv6 and MIPv4. >>> Of course you may not be able modify existing RFCs but just write it >>> as a new draft and do not bother dmm where future protocol work is >>> supposed to be done. >>> >>> Behcet >>> >>>> - Jouni >>>> >>>> >>>> 1/8/2016, 6:50 AM, Thierry Ernst kirjoitti: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alex, all, >>>>> >>>>> My understanding of what Jouni wrote is that it’s fine to work on MIP6 >>>>> improvement, but the MIP4 can live its life as is, to which I totally >>>>> agree. >>>>> And I also agree with Alex that we need to fix bugs in MIP6 (and the >>>>> related >>>>> suite, in particular NEMO) and progress them in the standard track. It has >>>>> been too long since we last work on those and now it is certainly right to >>>>> do it. >>>>> >>>>> So, the question is if DMM is the right place or not to do the work, if >>>>> not I would like to hear about alternatives within the IETF. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Thierry. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Le 8 janv. 2016 à 13:54, Alexandre Petrescu >>>>>> <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Le 22/12/2015 04:56, Jouni a écrit : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Behcet, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic >>>>>>> conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6 >>>>>>> maintenance since these protocol families are already past their >>>>>>> prime time as “hot research topics". Looking at the existing charter >>>>>>> I cannot find too much love towards anything IPv4 so I think we can >>>>>>> let MIPv4 finally rest in peace. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Jouni I can agree with you in general. >>>>>> >>>>>> But let me suggest that MIPv4 and MIPv6 are two implementations very >>>>>> important in some places including where I work. >>>>>> >>>>>> They are no longer 'hot' as you say, but there are certainly protocol and >>>>>> implementation bugs which need correction. Actually some of the >>>>>> corrections >>>>>> have already been applied but are not reflected in RFCs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sometimes there is a feeling of frustration if implementations thrive >>>>>> where WG cares little. >>>>>> >>>>>> <provocative> a widespread implementation of MIP6 is still bugged and >>>>>> does not respect the MIPv6 RFC - do you want that discussed >>>>>> publicly?</provocative>. >>>>>> >>>>>> Alex >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Jouni >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Jouni, all, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no >>>>>>>> one uses? For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find >>>>>>>> their places in the conferences or journals. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as >>>>>>>> well? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Behcet >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jouni, all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my >>>>>>>>> post-adoption call to the three drafts. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Carlos >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Folks, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed: >>>>>>>>>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-00 >>>>>>>>>> draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03 draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The adoption for the first two was unanimous. The last >>>>>>>>>> (draft-seita- *) received few concerns but the number of >>>>>>>>>> supporters was enough to convince the chairs there is enough >>>>>>>>>> interest and support to work on it. The chairs encourage the >>>>>>>>>> authors of draft-seite-* to pay close attention and work out >>>>>>>>>> the concerns raised during the adoption call. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> For the I-D authors. Please, submit draft-ietf-*-00 versions of >>>>>>>>>> the documents as soon as possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> - Jouni & Dapeng >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing >>>>>>>>>> list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list >>>>>>>>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> dmm mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dmm mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmm mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
