Hi Jouni,
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Jouni <[email protected]> wrote: > > Behcet, > > Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic > conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6 maintenance > since these protocol families are already past their prime time as “hot > research topics". Are you second guessing conference/journal decision people? Again, with my academic background I can say that we should stay away from such things. Another implication of what you seem to be saying is that these poor guys can not publish in conferences/journals, dmm should give them a refuge? Of course ISE could be a channel, just say go to ISE. > Looking at the existing charter As you know charters can be modified. Especially charter items are easy to be modified, i.e. probably no need to go to IESG. I have seen chairs modifying charter items, with AD approval. > I cannot find too much love towards anything IPv4 so I think we can let MIPv4 > finally rest in peace. Maybe that's your thinking, other people may have different opinion. Behcet > > - Jouni > > >> On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Jouni, all, >> >> Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no one uses? >> For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find their places in >> the conferences or journals. >> >> Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as well? >> >> Regards, >> >> Behcet >> >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Jouni, all, >>> >>> Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my post-adoption >>> call to the three drafts. >>> >>> Carlos >>> >>> On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote: >>>> Folks, >>>> >>>> The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed: >>>> draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-00 >>>> draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03 >>>> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02 >>>> >>>> The adoption for the first two was unanimous. The last (draft-seita- >>>> *) >>>> received few concerns but the number of supporters was enough to >>>> convince the chairs there is enough interest and support to work on >>>> it. >>>> The chairs encourage the authors of draft-seite-* to pay close >>>> attention >>>> and work out the concerns raised during the adoption call. >>>> >>>> For the I-D authors. Please, submit draft-ietf-*-00 versions of the >>>> documents as soon as possible. >>>> >>>> - Jouni & Dapeng >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dmm mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dmm mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
