Le 22/12/2015 04:56, Jouni a écrit :

Behcet,

Thank you for your constructive comments. I believe academic
conferences/journals are not appropriate venues for PMIPv6/MIPv6
maintenance since these protocol families are already past their
prime time as “hot research topics". Looking at the existing charter
I cannot find too much love towards anything IPv4 so I think we can
let MIPv4 finally rest in peace.

Jouni I can agree with you in general.

But let me suggest that MIPv4 and MIPv6 are two implementations very important in some places including where I work.

They are no longer 'hot' as you say, but there are certainly protocol and implementation bugs which need correction. Actually some of the corrections have already been applied but are not reflected in RFCs.

Sometimes there is a feeling of frustration if implementations thrive where WG cares little.

<provocative> a widespread implementation of MIP6 is still bugged and does not respect the MIPv6 RFC - do you want that discussed publicly?</provocative>.

Alex


- Jouni


On 21 Dec 2015, at 09:46, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]>
wrote:

Hi Jouni, all,

Let me ask what is the point in maintaining the protocols that no
one uses? For academic purposes? If yes, then they should find
their places in the conferences or journals.

Now, mip4 WG has been closed. So is dmm going to maintain mip4 as
well?

Regards,

Behcet

On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:45 AM, Carlos Jesús Bernardos Cano
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Jouni, all,

Although I'm already late, I just wanted to express my
post-adoption call to the three drafts.

Carlos

On Wed, 2015-12-16 at 08:32 -0800, Jouni Korhonen wrote:
Folks,

The WG adoption call for all three I-Ds have completed:
draft-gundavelli-dmm-lma-controlled-mag-params-00
draft-yan-dmm-hnprenum-03 draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

The adoption for the first two was unanimous. The last
(draft-seita- *) received few concerns but the number of
supporters was enough to convince the chairs there is enough
interest and support to work on it. The chairs encourage the
authors of draft-seite-* to pay close attention and work out
the concerns raised during the adoption call.

For the I-D authors. Please, submit draft-ietf-*-00 versions of
the documents as soon as possible.

- Jouni & Dapeng

_______________________________________________ dmm mailing
list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list
[email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to