+1

I support WGLC for this draft. Experimental track seems to be a good choice as 
well for this draft.

Cheers,
Pablo.

From: dmm <[email protected]> on behalf of Akbar Rahman 
<[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 15 January 2019 at 15:34
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

+1

I support progressing this document.  As mentioned by Sri, this document has 
good through several reviews already, and I think it is in good shape
.


Best Regards,


Akbar

From: dmm [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Moses, Danny
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 6:33 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03

Hi,

I support WGLC for this draft.

Danny

From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 7:43 PM
Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on 
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt&data=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628&sdata=GoGZrluqjX6gEPkzX3iWJW9mosQw56UHQZJlNEdml%2BE%3D&reserved=0>.

We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from 
Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors 
and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any 
potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental 
track.

The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of 
reviews on this document.  The authors have addressed all the comments and 
there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the 
document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the 
working group.


The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback.

Document Link:
 
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://na01.safelinks..protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fid%2Fdraft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt&data=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628&sdata=CDUxNnfJvMooSN2666U4mpJmmRT6G54XxU78XgsmKag%3D&reserved=0>

The target status for this document is “Experimental”.

Please post any comments/concerns on the draft.


Thanks!
Dapeng & Sri


_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdmm&data=02%7C01%7CAkbar.Rahman%40InterDigital.com%7C60274eeab4b34a7c71ff08d67add3f2c%7Ce351b779f6d54e50856880e922d180ae%7C0%7C0%7C636831488005258628&sdata=W7lx74PGJ2u09iyEuJ7lB%2FoBAS4uN9IqpDQgOeU5PZ8%3D&reserved=0>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to