Hi all,
I support the WGLC for this draft, as well.
Best regards
Luis
On 2019-01-09 19:43, Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) wrote:
> Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt.
>
> WE HAVE ALSO MADE ONE KEY CHANGE TO THE DOCUMENT STATUS, MOVING IT FROM
> STANDARDS TRACK TO EXPERIMENTAL TRACK. WE THE CHAIRS HAVE TALKED TO THE
> AUTHORS AND THEY ARE OK WITH THIS CHANGE. WE ARE DONG THIS AS WE ARE NOT SURE
> ABOUT ANY POTENTIAL VENDOR IMPLEMENTATIONS AND SO WE CHOSE TO KEEP THIS ON
> EXPERIMENTAL TRACK.
>
> The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of
> reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and
> there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the
> document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the
> working group.
>
> The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback.
>
> Document Link:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt [1]
>
> The target status for this document is "Experimental".
>
> Please post any comments/concerns on the draft.
>
> Thanks!
> Dapeng & Sri
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
--
___________________________________________
Luis M. Contreras
[email protected]
[email protected]
Links:
------
[1] https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt
_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
