Hi all, I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent re-formatting: P.7 the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA
5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 P.9 Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted ;-) Thanks! Kind regards Dirk From: dmm <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave) Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 To: [email protected] Subject: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 Folks - As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep this on experimental track. The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the working group. The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. Document Link: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt<https://www.ietf..org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> The target status for this document is "Experimental". Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. Thanks! Dapeng & Sri
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
