Thanks a lot John! We'll address your comments in the next revision. Carlos
On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 6:11 PM John Kaippallimalil < [email protected]> wrote: > Review and comments on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03. > > > > The text in the draft is clear, and it is ready to move forward in my view. > > > > A couple of comments below: > > (not repeating nits that Dirk has already posted) > > > > Section 3: > > “As another note, the solution described in this document allows > performing per-prefix anchoring decisions, to support e.g., some flows to > be anchored at a central Home-DPA (like a traditional LMA)” > > Would be good to clarify a bit here: is this a result of the MN requesting > central anchoring (or not), or the result of the mobility topology (MAARs, > CMDs). > > > > Section 3.4: > > Does the implementation with parallel operations need to mention something > about race conditions. > It is probably fine in practice, but not a completely safe operation > (e.g., MAAR2 may forward data to MAAR1 before the route update at MAAR1 is > complete) > > Overall – the draft looks really good and ready. > > > > John > > > > > > > > *From:* dmm [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of * > [email protected] > *Sent:* Wednesday, January 16, 2019 10:18 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Cc:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > > > Hi all, > > I agree to forward the mature and very useful document to IESG. > > > > I just detected 3 very minor nits presumably created during recent > re-formatting: > > P.7 > > the MN-ID, Pref1 and MAAr1's address as a Proxy-CoA => the MN-ID, Pref1, > and MAAR1's address as a Proxy-CoA > > > > 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) an unicast a Router Advertisement > (RA) to the MN with Pref1 => 5. MAAR1 stores the BCE described in (1) and > unicasts a Router Advertisement (RA) to the MN with Pref1 > > P.9 > > Step 6. Is an empty one and SHOULD be deleted > > ;-) > > > > Thanks! > > Kind regards > > Dirk > > > > *From:* dmm <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli > (sgundave) > *Sent:* Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2019 19:44 > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [DMM] WGLC on draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03 > > > > Folks – As we discussed in the WG meeting at IETF103, we are issuing WGLC > on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt. > > > > *We have also made one key change to the document status, moving it from > Standards Track to Experimental Track. We the chairs have talked to the > authors and they are OK with this change. We are dong this as we are not > sure about any potential vendor implementations and so we chose to keep > this on experimental track.* > > > > The document went through several revisions and there were good amount of > reviews on this document. The authors have addressed all the comments and > there are no open issues that we are tracking at this time. We believe the > document is ready for IESG reviews and like to confirm the same from the > working group. > > > > > > The following message commences a two week WGLC for all feedback. > > > > Document Link: > > https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03.txt > <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dmm-pmipv6-dlif-03..txt> > > > > The target status for this document is “Experimental”. > > > > Please post any comments/concerns on the draft. > > > > > > Thanks! > > Dapeng & Sri > > > > >
_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
