Den 2017-12-28 17:11, skrev Steve Litt: > That's exactly my point. To do something better than my backup > solution, I would have needed to go with something less tested, with > less complete supporting software, and something I trust less than > ext4. I haven't had ext4 mess up on me in at least 6 years. Even ext2 > and ext3 messed up very rarely, and you could usually fix them with an > fsck.
I see what you mean, and I have never had a problem with ext4 either. But I have used btrfs on all my main machines for the last years, and have not had any (filesystem) problems with them either. I'd like to see empirical evidence that ext4 is so much more stable than btrfs. -- Hilsen Harald _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
