Quoting Steve Litt ([email protected]): > On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 01:15:10 +0100 > Harald Arnesen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I see what you mean, and I have never had a problem with ext4 either. > > But I have used btrfs on all my main machines for the last years, and > > have not had any (filesystem) problems with them either. I'd like to > > see empirical evidence that ext4 is so much more stable than btrfs. > > I can't give you empirical evidence. It's a guess on my part.
One can also reasonably say that the ext2/ext3/ext4 codebase has benefited from more real-world testing than any other *ix fileystem code in history. (ext4 departs significantly more from ext3 than the latter did from ext2, as detailed here: https://www.thomas-krenn.com/en/wiki/Ext4_Filesystem ) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list [email protected] https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
