I've not paid attention to Red Hat since FC1, so I have no idea what the issues are there. That's a whole different can of worms anyway.
If someone is happy to rebrand then it's fine. Also I don't mean to put down derivatives, I just think a defacto replacement would work out best. Thanks, chillfan ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On March 31, 2018 5:14 PM, Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote: > Quoting chillfan (chill...@protonmail.com): > > > I think it was important to point this situation out. If distributing > > > > free software can potentially get you into a legal situation this > > > > quickly, then it's just not worth the headache that follows. > > So, you're saying that CentOS and Scientific Linux are not safe to > > distribute? (I thought the problem with RHEL rebuilds is that they're > > kind of, you know, Red Hattish. ;-> ) > > Dng mailing list > > Dng@lists.dyne.org > > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
